Google product manager mock interview design question: “How would you improve Google Chrome?”

Click to expand the mind map for a detailed view.

1. Introduction

  • Interviewer: Anika, former PM at Google (YouTube, Google Search, Maps).
  • Candidate: Akshat, former PM at Google (Messages, Google Stadia).
  • Objective: Demonstrate how to ace a PM interview by answering, “How would you improve Google Chrome?”

2. Clarifying the Question

  • Key Action: Ask clarifying questions to narrow down the problem space.
  • Question 1: What does “improve” mean? Are we optimizing for user acquisition, engagement, or satisfaction?
  • Question 2: What metrics should we focus on? (e.g., DAU, MAU, CSAT, NPS, ARPU).
  • Outcome: Focus on user satisfaction (CSAT) as the primary metric for improvement.

3. High-Level Approach

  • Goal: Improve user satisfaction (CSAT) for Google Chrome.
  • Segmentation: Break down users into three segments:
  1. Power Users: Knowledge workers who spend most of their day on Chrome.
  2. Casual Users: Users who browse the internet semi-frequently.
  3. Light Users: Infrequent users (e.g., older populations, areas with less connectivity).
  • Focus: Prioritize power users as they are high-value and most impacted by Chrome’s performance.

4. Identifying Pain Points for Power Users

  • Pain Point 1: Power Usage – Chrome consumes significant memory and battery.
  • Pain Point 2: Productivity – Chrome should help users work efficiently without friction.
  • Focus Area: Improve productivity for power users.

5. Feature Ideas to Improve Productivity

5.1 Universal Search Bar

  • Problem: Users struggle to find specific documents among many open tabs.
  • Solution: A universal search bar that searches:
  1. Open Tabs: Quickly navigate to already open documents.
  2. Google Drive: Cache Google Drive for faster searches.
  3. History: Search browsing history for recently accessed files.
  • User Experience: Invoke via keyboard shortcut, type a keyword, and instantly find the document.
  • Impact: Saves significant time for users who frequently search for documents.

5.2 Meeting Notifications

  • Problem: Users miss meetings because they are distracted by multiple tabs.
  • Solution: Integrate Google Calendar with Chrome to send meeting notifications.
  • Feature: Automatically detect meeting links (e.g., Zoom, Google Meet) and provide a one-click join option.
  • User Experience: Users receive notifications directly in Chrome, reducing the need to switch tabs.
  • Impact: Helps users stay on schedule and reduces distractions.

5.3 Smart Tab Management

  • Problem: Users experience cognitive overload from too many open tabs.
  • Solution: Use AI/ML to automatically manage tabs:
  • Frequently Used Tabs: Keep important tabs (e.g., email, calendar) open.
  • Unused Tabs: Automatically close or archive tabs that are no longer needed (e.g., search results).
  • User Experience: Toggle a “Smart Tab Manager” setting to let Chrome learn and optimize tab usage.
  • Impact: Reduces cognitive burden and improves user delight.

6. Prioritizing Features

  • Criteria for Prioritization:
  1. Time Saved: How much time will the feature save users?
  2. Applicability: How many users will benefit from the feature?
  3. Cost to Build: Is the feature feasible to implement?
  • Prioritization:
  1. Universal Search Bar:
    • Time Saved: High (users frequently search for documents).
    • Applicability: Broad (especially for G Suite users).
    • Cost to Build: Moderate (Google already has strong search infrastructure).
  2. Meeting Notifications:
    • Time Saved: Moderate (useful for users with many meetings).
    • Applicability: Narrower (primarily benefits users with frequent meetings).
    • Cost to Build: Moderate (requires calendar integration).
  3. Smart Tab Management:
    • Time Saved: Low (reduces cognitive burden but doesn’t save much time).
    • Applicability: Broad (all users with many tabs).
    • Cost to Build: High (requires AI/ML capabilities).
  • Decision: Prioritize Universal Search Bar first due to its high impact, broad applicability, and reasonable cost.

7. Conclusion

  • Key Takeaway: Always communicate your thought process clearly during the interview.
  • Interviewer Feedback: Akshat excelled in structuring his response, explaining his thinking, and prioritizing features based on data-driven criteria.
  • Call to Action: For more interview prep, visit IGotAnOffer.

Related Posts